top of page
  • Writer's pictureJust Well Law

Star Advertiser: Closing Arguments Made in Red Hill Lawsuit Trial

In the wake of the Red Hill water crisis, families impacted by the toxic exposure embarked on a legal battle against the federal government, invoking the Federal Tort Claims Act. The trial, presided over by U.S. District Court Judge Leslie Kobayashi without a jury, recently reached a pivotal phase with both sides presenting their closing arguments.

Attorney Kristina Baehr, representing the affected families, highlighted the acknowledged negligence by both parties but emphasized the nuanced assessment of the harm inflicted. The families' legal team is advocating for compensation ranging from $225,000 to $1.25 million per individual, contingent upon the severity of their suffering and injuries.

The crisis unfolded in November 2021 when fuel spilled at the Red Hill storage facility, contaminating the water supply serving 93,000 residents. Despite initial assurances from Navy officials, reports of peculiar odors and physical ailments soon emerged among residents. The ensuing trial saw medical and water system experts presenting contrasting viewpoints regarding the extent of the contamination and its health implications.

While the plaintiffs argue that the contamination spread extensively through the interconnected waterline, the government contends that the reported symptoms were not directly attributable to the fuel exposure. The trial witnessed emotional testimonies and legal arguments grappling with the complexities of causation and accountability.

As the trial draws to a close, Judge Kobayashi's impending decision holds significant ramifications for the broader legal landscape surrounding water contamination cases. The outcome could potentially pave the way for further litigation or settlements for the thousands of individuals represented by Baehr's legal team, Just Well Law based in Austin, Texas.

In a poignant post-closing argument reflection, toxic torts attorney Kristina Baehr underscored the historic significance of the case, highlighting the unprecedented real-time response and the government's acknowledgment of liability. The families' pursuit of justice, she asserted, is rooted in a desire to protect their loved ones, the environment, and the nation at large.

The trial also served as a platform for military families and local activists to amplify their voices, shedding light on the enduring challenges of toxic exposure faced by service members. Their resilience and community support underscored the profound impact of the crisis and the collective call for accountability and reform within the military establishment.

Read the full article on Star Advertiser.


bottom of page